The confrontation between Shark ZU561 vs UV725 was relatively equal, but I decided the second one was the winner.
The Shark UV725 generates lots of suction power to reduce your cleaning burden. One of its selling points is the self-cleaning brush roll, which is ideal for pet owners. This machine is heavy and bulky, but it’s a real bargain if you can get used to it!
The Shark ZU561 stands out from others thanks to its lightweight, easy-to-use, easy maneuverability, and powerful suction. This model really makes your cleaning chores easier and encourages more frequent use. Overall, this vacuum is great value for money so far.
Shark ZU561 vs UV725: Comparison Chart
Shark ZU561 vs UV725: Differences
The UV725 wins 2-1 and draws one against the ZU561. The former is a nice upright with a super long cord, great suction, and four little led lights in front that are great for looking under furniture.
Cleaning Performance
Winner: Shark UV725
The suction of the UV725 is adequate, enough to pick up everything on my floor and carpet. I was glad that most of the sucked hair didn’t end up on the brush roll due to the self-cleaning brush roll.
The self-cleaning brush roll isn’t perfect, but only about 1 or 2% of the hair is left on the brush roll, while the rest is sent into the dust cup. I’m assuming this happens because the hairs accumulate just before you turn the machine off, so you must let it run a bit after getting the job done to clean the roller. Don’t just leave it on without moving it.
Adding to the convenience of the UV725 is the LED headlight. It has some lights in front of the nozzle, allowing you to detect dust and dirt and suck them all up with ease.
The ZU561 also has strong suction, allowing it to suck up a good amount of small-to-large debris on my hard floor and low-pile carpet with a single pass. But it’s harder to push on my denser but not particularly thick carpet.
I tried to adjust the suction until the machine moved more freely, but it didn’t clean effectively. I didn’t consider this a deal breaker, but an inconvenience nonetheless since I had to do more than two passes to remove all the debris.
Thanks to a self-cleaning brush roll and Zero-M technology, the ZU561 also worked great at picking up pet and human hair without the hair wrap on the roller. It didn’t prevent everything from wrapping up, but I could notice that it limited anything getting caught up on the roller.
Design and Usability
Winner: Tie
Weight and Maneuverability
The UV725 weighs 18 pounds. And although I have built up a bit of strength by testing numerous upright vacuums, I must admit that this machine is too heavy. Unless you want your cleaning chore to be a HIIT workout, you probably don’t want to go with this machine.
The UV725, on the other hand, is lightweight at 14 pounds. It’s definitely not the lightest model out there, but it’s still ideal for those with arthritis and back problems.
These machines are quite bulky, and the large size of their dust canisters can prevent them from getting under dressers and beds even partially. The only way you know you have tried to go too far is when the machine hits your furniture, which isn’t good.
The swivel feature on both is nice but can be frustrating for some users. If you are a beginner, you may find it hard on your wrist and hand to keep your vacuum in a straight line. But once you get used to it, you’ll love it since it allows for easy maneuvering around obstacles and getting in and out of tight areas.
Cord Length
This is another area where the UV725 triumphs over the ZU561. With a 30-foot power cord, the UV725 allowed me to reach nearly every corner of my home with just a single outlet change.
As for the UV725, its cord length is 25 feet, and I wish it were 5 to 6 feet longer. If you opt for this machine, it is wise to use an extension cord. Otherwise, you will find yourself unplugging and plugging in again and again.
Dust Cup Capacity
Winner: Shark UV725
Both the Shark ZU561 vs UV725 use large dust cups to hold large amounts of dust and dirt that get sucked into the unit, but the overall capacities are different between them. The NV752 takes the lead with a 3.30-quart dust cup, which allows for storing more dust at once than the dirt bin of the ZU561, which only has a capacity of 2.2 quarts.
Worth To Buy
Winner: Shark ZU561
The former is a nice upright with a super long cord, great suction, and four little led lights in front that are great for looking under furniture, which is in excellent condition and fully functional. If you can afford a brand-new ZU561, you will be good to go with it. But if you are on a tight budget but still want an ideal model for hair removal, the UV725 is your best bet.
Since the ZU561 isn’t costly and I’m always in favor of buying something new, I decided the ZU561 was the best bang for the buck.
Shark ZU561 vs UV725: Similarities
Type
Shark ZU561 vs UV725 are two powerful corded upright vacuum cleaners that only work on dry surfaces.
The UV725 has an 890-watt motor, while the UV725 comes with an 800-watt one, providing just decent suction to quickly and efficiently remove dust and dirt from your home with minimal work. They also share a suction control slider, which helps you save energy when the high suction power is overkill for your cleaning task.
These machines have a somewhat compact design and are well-built for years of service. Handling and maintenance are easy thanks to the bagless design that holds dust captured from both indoor and outdoor areas around the house. You also won’t need to worry about replacement dirtbag costs like those for bagless ones.
Lift-Away Feature
Most upright vacuums from this brand can be used as semi-handheld models thanks to the Lift-Away feature, and the Shark ZU561 vs UV725 is no exception. So every time you need to clean hard-to-reach areas, all you need to do is detach the canister of your chosen vacuum from its floorhead and work with its wand.
Filter
Shark has equipped these vacuums with a HEPA filter, which is considered the best option for capturing dust, dirt, pollen, and mold in the air. Combined with Shark’s anti-allergen complete seal technology, these models can ensure the air you breathe is fresh and free of allergens.
Warranty
Another thing that Shark ZU561 vs UV725 have in common is that they both carry Shark’s five-year warranty, which covers all manufacturing defects. Hence, once you detect any company defect for the next five years from the date of purchase, Shark will replace or repair your vacuum without charging you any extra money. The exceptions to this policy include water damage and parts or attachments not covered under Shark’s warranty.
Quick Rundown Of Shark UV725
- Lift-Away For Above-Floor Cleaning
- Self-Cleaning Brushroll for Powerful Pet Hair Pickup with No Hair Wrap
- Swivel steering lets you easily maneuver your vacuum in and out of tight spaces, in corners, around furniture, and more
- Use as an upright vacuum for powerful floor and carpet cleaning, or for more portability, detach the pod to go into the lift-away mode to easily clean above-floor areas like furniture and stairs
- Powerful LED headlights on the nozzle reveal hidden debris around your home
Quick Rundown Of Shark ZU561
- Self-cleaning brushroll for powerful pet hair pickup with no hair wrap.
- Use as an upright vacuum for powerful floor and carpet cleaning. Or for more portability, detach the pod to go into Lift-Away mode to easily clean, above-floor areas like furniture and stairs.
- Anti-Allergen Complete Seal Technology and a HEPA filter traps over 99.9% of dust and allergens inside the vacuum cleaner.
- Swivel Steering provides effortless maneuverability for cleaning hard-to-reach areas.
- Suction control slider to manage suction power from hard floors to carpets.
Product Video
Related Articles to Shark Uv725
- Shark NV501 vs UV725: Unveiling The Best Choice For Your Home Cleaning Needs
- Shark UV725 vs CU530: Best Choices For Affordable Vacuums Up To Date?
- Shark UV440 vs UV725 – Which Vacuum Comes Out on Top?
- Vacuum Showdown: Shark UV725 vs NV586 – Which One Win?
- Shark UV725 vs DuoClean AZ2002: Does More Expensive Mean Better?
- Shark UV650 vs UV725: Which One Should You Go For?
- Shark UV725 vs NV752: Are These Machines Worth Their Price Tags? Which One Is The Winner?
- Comparing The Shark UV725 vs ZU62: Which Is Better?
- Shark Navigator vs Shark Performance: A Honest Review And Comparison
- Shark UV725 vs NV352: Which One Gives You a Better Vacuuming Experience?
- Shark UV725 vs NV360: Which One Should You Pick?
Related Articles to Shark Zu561
- Shark ZU561 Vs ZU503AMZ Navigator Comparison: Two Powerful Vacuums With Good Self-cleaning Brushroll
- Shark Navigator UV440 vs ZU561 Complete Comparison: Which Vacuum Is The Better?
- Shark LA502 vs ZU561: Which One Should Be Your Next Vacuum?
- Shark ZU561 vs ZU562: They Appear Identical But Have One Important Difference
- Dyson Ball Animal 2 vs Shark Navigator ZU561: A Head-To-Head Comparison
- Shark ZU62 vs ZU561: 5 Basic Differences Between These Two Shark Vacuum Models
- Shark ZU561 vs NV586: Which Vacuum Cleaner Reigns Supreme for Your Cleaning Needs?
- Shark NV352 vs ZU561: A Head-To-Head Comparison
- Shark ZU561 vs NV501: Is There Any Difference Between Them? – Pick The Winner!
- Shark Navigator ZU560 vs ZU561: Is There Any Difference?
- Shark NV360 vs ZU561: Which Vacuum Cleaner Is The Best Today?
- Shark ZU561 vs NV356E: The Main Differences Between Two Shark Best Basic Vacuum Cleaners
References:
Victor K. Giles is a leading consultant and expert in vacuum cleaner technology with over a decade of experience. As a mechanical engineering graduate in the University of Michigan, he specializes in product development, design optimization, and performance analysis. Victor collaborates with manufacturers and educates consumers, making her a sought-after guest speaker at industry events. His work has been featured in renowned publications, and he shares his expertise on his blog, “The Vacuum Teria”. Victor’s passion for cleaner, healthier living spaces drives his to help clients choose the best vacuum solutions for their needs.