When it comes to comparing Shark UV725 vs NV586 vacuum cleaners, both models offer features that ensure efficient and easy cleaning. However, if I had to choose between the two, I would undoubtedly choose the NV586.
The Shark NV586 boasts a more powerful and lighter engine than its counterpart, the Shark UV725. This model also features a larger dust cup and LED headlights, providing more efficient cleaning even in poorly lit or dark areas of your home. I find the Shark NV586 to be highly maneuverable and have been thoroughly impressed with its performance.
The Shark UV725 boasts a super-long 30-foot cord, making it an excellent option for cleaning larger indoor areas. Additionally, its LED headlights are a noteworthy feature that provides an advantage when cleaning in dimly lit or dark areas.
Shark UV725 vs NV586: Comparison Chart
Shark UV725 vs NV586: Differences
After comparing the performance of the Shark UV725 with the NV586, I conclude that the Shark NV586 wins 3-0 and draws 1 against the UV725 thanks to its cleaning performance and some useful features. For further details, please refer to the article below.
Cleaning performance
The winner: Shark NV586
Compatible Floor Type
When it comes to buying a vacuum cleaner, versatility when sucking on different surfaces is key. We tested the cleaning abilities of both the Shark UV725 vs NV586 on various surfaces, including hardwood floors, high-pile carpets, and low-pile carpets, using common household debris such as rice, sugar, and cat fur. Our detailed analysis and results are outlined below to help you make an informed decision.
Hardwood floors
After testing both the Shark UV725 and NV586 vacuum cleaners on hard wooden floors, the results were surprising. Using large cleaning heads to ensure optimal results, we found that while both performed well, the NV586 stood out. It collected over 85% of the dispersed debris, while the UV725 collected 80% but required slightly more passes. Additionally, user opinions echoed our findings, praising the NV586’s strong suction on hard wooden floors, exceeding their expectations at its price point.
In general, the comparative test shows that NV586 works a bit better with UV725 on hard wooden floors, making it a great choice for people who need to vacuum with strong suction force on this surface.
High-pile carpets
When it comes to cleaning high-pile carpets, the Shark NV586 outshines its UV725 counterpart. With the convenience of a control button for switching between surfaces, the NV586 delivers an impressive cleaning performance, removing up to 94% of debris such as rice, cereal, and hair. Surprisingly, it even collects some unexpected debris that had been hiding in the carpet.
However, the UV725 struggles with various debris and can be difficult to control on carpets, as it tends to collect hair and cause the brush to clog during operation. Despite both models facing challenges with certain types of debris, the NV586 emerges as the top choice in this test.
Low Pile Carpet
During our thorough testing, we evaluated the cleaning performance of both the Shark UV725 vs NV586 vacuum cleaners on low-pile carpets, and the results were quite impressive. We were able to recover up to 92% of the debris we scattered during testing in just a few passes, indicating that both machines are efficient at picking up dirt and debris from low-pile carpets. Additionally, we found that both models delivered satisfactory results in this test, which speaks to the overall quality and effectiveness of these Shark vacuums.
Suction power
When comparing the Shark UV725 to the NV586, one of the main differences is the overall engine power.
The NV586 boasts a powerful 1140W engine, which provides more suction energy and effectively removes stubborn stains, dirt, and debris from the depths of your carpet for a flawless clean. This model also allows you to adjust the suction power to achieve optimal cleaning results.
On the other hand, the UV725 features an 800W engine, which consumes less energy but provides less suction power. However, it’s still powerful enough to meet your family’s daily cleaning needs. While the NV586 may be the better option for deep cleaning, the UV725’s lower power consumption may make it a more economical choice for some households.
Dirt bin capacity
The winner: Shark NV586
Compared to the Shark UV725, which has a trash capacity of 0.9 quarts, the Shark NV586’s trash can is substantially larger, holding up to 2.4 quarts. This larger capacity is especially useful for cleaning large spaces, as it allows you to pick up more dirt and debris before having to stop and empty the canister.
For families with pets, the Shark NV725’s smaller trash can may be a drawback, as it may need to be emptied more frequently due to the additional pet hair and dander. However, for households without pets, the trash can should be sufficient to collect debris from an average-sized room before requiring emptying.
Both vacuums are designed with a one-touch button that opens the hatch for easy disposal of dirt and debris. Additionally, since they are both bagless vacuums, you won’t have to spend extra money on buying bags. Overall, the Shark NV586’s larger trash can is a significant advantage, especially for those with larger homes or those who prefer to clean without frequent interruptions.
Design and Convenience
The winner: Shark NV586
Dimensions and weight
When comparing the Shark UV725 and NV586, size, and weight are two factors that can greatly affect their ease of use. UV725 measures 12 x 9.5 x 45.6 inches and weighs 16.7 lbs, while NV586 is slightly larger at 13.4 x 12 x 45.9 inches but lighter at 15.2 lbs.
As someone who frequently vacuums various rooms and navigates up and down stairs, I find weight to be an important consideration. In this aspect, I was impressed by the lightweight design of the NV586, despite its larger size. It feels easy to maneuver and carry, even for someone with weaker hands. Therefore, I believe NV586 deserves recognition in this round for its convenience and portability.
Hose Length
The spout length of Shark UV725 is a notable limitation that may affect its ability to clean certain areas, such as high ceilings and under furniture. Its short 4-foot hose restricts the efficient use of accessory components, and you may need to purchase additional equipment to expand your reach, increasing your costs.
On the other hand, the Shark NV586 features a hose that’s about 6 feet long, providing a slightly better reach for higher and harder-to-reach places. I believe a longer hose is always better, as it provides greater accessibility to various clean areas in your home with ease.
Utilities
Tie
Both the Shark UV725 vs NV586 come equipped with LED headlights, which many users consider a key feature of upright vacuum cleaners. The LED lights located at the front of the machines provide excellent visibility of the dirt and debris on your path, especially in dimly lit areas. The LED spotlight on the spout helps to detect hidden debris in dark places in your home, such as under furniture, in closets, in basements, and on poorly lit stairs.
This feature is particularly useful for pet owners, as it can help detect pet hair on the floor that would otherwise be difficult to see. Even if you think your floor is clean, the LED lights can reveal just how much dirt and dust is present. In my experience, the LED headlights are an excellent feature that enhances the cleaning capabilities of these vacuum cleaners.
Shark UV725 vs NV586: Similarities
Filters Type
Both Shark UV725 vs NV586 comes with two filters, a washable foam filter and a HEPA filter after the motor. These models are equipped with complete anti-Allergen technology, ensuring that all the dirt and allergens are trapped inside the vacuum.
To maintain the optimum performance of these filters, it is advisable to wash them with warm water at least once a year. It is important not to use any detergent when washing the filters. After washing, let the filters dry for at least 24 hours before reinstalling them into the machine. This ensures that the filters are completely dry and will not cause any damage to the vacuum cleaner. By following these tips, you can maintain the efficiency and durability of your Shark vacuum cleaner.
Range
When it comes to cord length, the Shark UV725 vs NV586 offer a generous 30 feet power cord, which is perfect for those who want to clean large indoor spaces without worrying about constantly changing outlets. However, it’s important to note that these machines do not have automatic cord rewinding features, which means that the cord needs to be wrapped manually. While some users may see this as a drawback, personally, I find it easy to wrap the cord by hand and don’t see it as a significant issue.
Additionally, having a longer cord length allows for more flexibility and mobility when cleaning, making it easier to reach every nook and cranny of a room without the need for extension cords or multiple outlets. Overall, the 30 feet cord length of the Shark UV725 vs NV586 provides a convenient and practical solution for efficient cleaning.
Quick Rundown Of Shark NV586
Quick Rundown Of Shark UV725
- Lift-Away For Above-Floor Cleaning
- Self-Cleaning Brushroll for Powerful Pet Hair Pickup with No Hair Wrap
- Swivel steering lets you easily maneuver your vacuum in and out of tight spaces, in corners, around furniture, and more
- Use as an upright vacuum for powerful floor and carpet cleaning, or for more portability, detach the pod to go into the lift-away mode to easily clean above-floor areas like furniture and stairs
- Powerful LED headlights on the nozzle reveal hidden debris around your home
Product Video
Related Articles to Shark Nv586
- Shark NV752 Vs NV586: Which One Offers the Best Value for Your Money?
- Shark ZU561 vs NV586: Which Vacuum Cleaner Reigns Supreme for Your Cleaning Needs?
- Shark NV501 vs NV586: Which Vacuum Cleaner is Right for You?
- Shark NV352 vs NV586: Which One Is Best For House Use?
- Shark NV360 vs NV586: Which Vacuum Is Better?
- Shark NV356E vs NV586: Which Vacuum is better?
Related Articles to Shark Uv725
- Shark NV501 vs UV725: Unveiling The Best Choice For Your Home Cleaning Needs
- Shark UV725 vs CU530: Best Choices For Affordable Vacuums Up To Date?
- Shark UV440 vs UV725 – Which Vacuum Comes Out on Top?
- Shark UV725 vs DuoClean AZ2002: Does More Expensive Mean Better?
- Shark UV650 vs UV725: Which One Should You Go For?
- Shark UV725 vs NV752: Are These Machines Worth Their Price Tags? Which One Is The Winner?
- Comparing The Shark UV725 vs ZU62: Which Is Better?
- A Detailed Comparison Of Shark ZU561 vs UV725: Which One You Should Choose?
- Shark Navigator vs Shark Performance: A Honest Review And Comparison
- Shark UV725 vs NV352: Which One Gives You a Better Vacuuming Experience?
- Shark UV725 vs NV360: Which One Should You Pick?
References:
- Shark NV586 (same NV581) : https://support.sharkclean.com/hc/en-us/articles/4656584191004-NV581-Series-Shark-Navigator-Powered-Lift-Away-Owner-s-Guide
- Shark UV725: https://support.sharkclean.com/hc/en-us/sections/360005960739-UV700-Series
Victor K. Giles is a leading consultant and expert in vacuum cleaner technology with over a decade of experience. As a mechanical engineering graduate in the University of Michigan, he specializes in product development, design optimization, and performance analysis. Victor collaborates with manufacturers and educates consumers, making her a sought-after guest speaker at industry events. His work has been featured in renowned publications, and he shares his expertise on his blog, “The Vacuum Teria”. Victor’s passion for cleaner, healthier living spaces drives his to help clients choose the best vacuum solutions for their needs.