Shark IX141 Vs WZ240: Which Vacuum Comes Out On Top?

I get commissions for purchases made through links in this post. Read more

Shark is a famous vacuum brand with many models for different needs. One popular category is the cordless stick vacuum, which has powerful suction and cordless convenience. In this article, I will compare two models: the Shark IX141 Vs WZ240. Which one is better?

The Shark WZ240 is a pet-friendly cordless stick vacuum with a self-cleaning brushroll and PowerFins technology that cleans carpets and floors deeply. Besides, it has a removable handheld vacuum and an XL dust cup with CleanTouch technology for easy dirt disposal that can save time and effort for users. 

The Shark IX141 is a cordless stick vacuum that has some similar features to the WZ240, such as suction control and a lightweight build. However, it lacks a self-cleaning brushroll, which is a limitation for pet owners and allergy sufferers. While the Shark IX141 runs a close second to the WZ240 in terms of overall performance, its lacking features make it the runner-up.

Shark IX141 Vs WZ240: Comparison Chart

Image
THE RUNNER-UP (#2)
Shark Pet Cordless Stick Vacuum with XL Dust Cup, LED Headlights, Removable Handheld Vac, Crevice Tool, Portable Vacuum for Household Pet Hair, Carpet and Hard Floors, 40min Runtime, Grey, IX141
Model
Shark IX141
Color
Iris
Dimensions
10.24 x 7.09 x 46.09 inches
Weight
7.2 pounds
Corded/ Cordless
Cordless
Bagged/Bagless
Bagless
LED Headlights
Self-Standing
Dust Cup Capacity
0.4 quarts
Self-Cleaning Roller
Handheld Vacuum
Swivel Steering
HEPA Filter
Washable Filter
Controller Type
Handle Control
What I Like
More Info
THE RUNNER-UP (#2)
Image
Shark Pet Cordless Stick Vacuum with XL Dust Cup, LED Headlights, Removable Handheld Vac, Crevice Tool, Portable Vacuum for Household Pet Hair, Carpet and Hard Floors, 40min Runtime, Grey, IX141
Model
Shark IX141
Color
Iris
Dimensions
10.24 x 7.09 x 46.09 inches
Weight
7.2 pounds
Corded/ Cordless
Cordless
Bagged/Bagless
Bagless
LED Headlights
Self-Standing
Dust Cup Capacity
0.4 quarts
Self-Cleaning Roller
Handheld Vacuum
Swivel Steering
HEPA Filter
Washable Filter
Controller Type
Handle Control
What I Like
More Info

Shark IX141 Vs WZ240: Differences

After conducting a thorough comparison between the Shark IX141 and the WZ240 vacuums, it appears that the WZ240 emerges as the clear winner, with a score of 2-0 and one ties. This is due to a variety of factors, such as ease of use, powerful suction, and the vacuum’s ability to capture more dust and debris compared to its rival effectively.

Cleaning performance

The winner: Shark WZ240

Brush roll system

The standard brush roll of the Shark IX141 is a common type of brush roll with bristles that spin and agitate the dirt and debris on the floor. It works well for cleaning most surfaces, but it has a drawback: it tends to get wrapped with hair and other fibers that can reduce its efficiency and damage its motor. I have to cut out the hair from the brush roll every once in a while, which is a bit time-consuming.

The Powerfins brush roll of the Shark WZ240 is a unique type with rubber fins that scrape and lift dirt and debris from the floor. It works better for cleaning deep into carpets and engaging hard floors without scratching them. It also has a self-cleaning feature: it does not get tangled with hair, as advertised, which is great! I don’t have to worry about cutting out the hair from the brush roll anymore, which saves me a lot of hassle and trouble.

Shark WZ240: Testing on area rug
Shark WZ240: Testing on area rug

Compatible floor type

The Shark IX141 is versatile, enabling me to switch between carpet and hard floor modes easily. However, I was not truly impressed by its suction power. On my carpet, which has some uneven spots, it failed to pick up all the crumbs and dust that were stuck in the crevices. Instead, I had to press the extra suction button to get them out, which drained the battery faster. It did an okay job on my area rugs, but not great. 

When it comes to hardwood or other hard-surfaced floors, the suction leaves something to be desired. Keeping the machine in rug mode can help pick up more debris, yet it still struggles to tidy up debris against walls and corners. 

The Shark WZ240 can handle both carpet and hard floors. With its strong suction, it can pick up small debris with ease. However, larger debris may require multiple passes to clean the area fully. Additionally, the vacuum may not be as effective on area rugs, as some dirt may be difficult to remove completely. 

Design & convenience

The winner: Shark WZ240

Weight

The Shark IX141 weighs 7.2 pounds, which is slightly lighter than the Shark WZ240, which weighs 7.63 pounds. This may not seem like a big difference, but it can make a difference when you have to lift the vacuum cleaner up and down stairs or when you have to hold it for a long time. I found that the Shark IX141 felt more comfortable and less tiring to carry than the Shark WZ240, especially when I had to clean multiple rooms or floors.

Dirt bin

As a pet owner, I find it imperative to have a machine that can handle frequent use without requiring constant emptying. The Shark IX141 is a good choice, but it does necessitate frequent emptying every 5-10 minutes. In addition, with a capacity of only 0.4 quarts, it may not be ideal for those who desire a more efficient and hassle-free cleaning experience.

On the other hand, the Shark WZ240 boasts a significantly larger capacity of 0.83 quarts, which can handle more significant messes without requiring frequent emptying. Its slender design also makes it effortless to dispose of dirt and crumbs. 

Battery

The Shark IX141 boasts a 21.6 V battery that takes 240 minutes to charge. That sounds like a lot of power and a long wait, but is it worth it? Well, not really. The battery only lasts for about 30 minutes, which is barely enough to vacuum one bedroom and some tile floors. And then I have to plug it in again for another four hours. That’s frustrating, especially when I have guests coming over or a spill to clean up. 

The Shark WZ240 has a slightly lower voltage and a shorter charging time (3 hours), but it also has a shorter run time (25-30 minutes). It’s not much better than the IX141, but at least it doesn’t keep me waiting as long. The battery life is sufficient for most of my one-story home in one pass, though I usually use it for smaller jobs like crumbs or pet hair. I wish it could last longer, but I guess that’s the trade-off for being cordless.

Utility

Tie! 

Shark IX141: Attachment
Shark IX141: Attachment

The crevice tool is a narrow nozzle that can fit into tight spaces between cushions, under furniture, or along baseboards. Both the Shark IX141 and the Shark WZ240 have this attachment, and they work decently for cleaning dust and debris. However, I noticed that the crevice tool of the Shark IX141 is slightly longer and thinner than the one of the Shark WZ240, which gives it a slight edge in reaching deeper and narrower areas.

The pet multi-tool of the Shark IX141 is supposed to be a versatile attachment that can remove pet hair from various surfaces, such as carpets, upholstery, or stairs. However, I was not particularly impressed by this attachment. It did not pick up all pet hair from my sofa or rug, requiring an extra pass. 

I remember that the previous pet hair attachments that Shark used to make had a self-powered rotating brush that worked much better. However, this one is plastic and bristles and does not warrant its high price.

The upholstery tool of the Shark WZ240 is a simple attachment with a wide mouth and a fabric strip that can catch lint and hair. It is designed to clean soft surfaces, such as sofas, curtains, or mattresses. I found this attachment to be quite effective. It also felt comfortable to use and easy to attach and detach.

Quick Rundown Of Shark WZ240 

No products found.

Pros
  • Powerful suction for everyday messes and high-traffic areas
  • Powerfins brushroll for continuous cleaning contact to dig deep into carpets and directly engage floors
  • Self-cleaning brushroll preventing hair tangling
  • Lightweight and easy to handle
  • Large dirt cup that can save time for disposing
Cons
  • Battery life is not long

Quick Rundown Of Shark IX141

Sale
Shark Pet Cordless Stick Vacuum with XL Dust Cup, LED Headlights, Removable Handheld Vac, Crevice Tool, Portable Vacuum for Household Pet Hair, Carpet and Hard Floors, 40min Runtime, Grey, IX141
  • HYPERVELOCITY SUCTION: Provides incredible suction power and cleaning performance for everyday messes and high-traffic areas
  • UP TO 40 MINUTES OF RUNTIME: Up to 40 minutes of runtime to clean your home *Measured at the hand vac in standard mode, without accessories
  • FLOOR-TO-CARPET VERSATILITY: Shark’s bristle brushroll and powerful suction deliver powerful cleaning on both floors and carpets
  • REMOVABLE HAND VAC: Transforms to a hand vac for lightweight above-floor cleaning
  • LED HEADLIGHTS: Illuminate hidden debris around the home
Pros
  • Relatively lightweight and easy to handle
  • LED headlights make it easy to see dirt and debris
  • The removable handheld feature makes it versatile
  • The crevice tool & pet multi-tool is suitable for cleaning different surfaces
  • Washable filter for easy maintenance
Cons
  • It can take a while to charge fully

Product Videos

Related Articles to Shark Ix141

  1. Shark UZ155 Vs IX141: The Ultimate Comparison Review
  2. Shark IX141 Vs IX142: Which One Is the Best Option for You?
  3. Shark IX141 vs Samsung Jet 60: Are You Ready To Make A Decision?
  4. Shark IX141 Vs Dyson V8: Which Cordless Stick Vacuum Is The Strongest?
  5. Shark IX141 Vs IZ140: Which Offers Better Value For The Money?
  6. Shark UZ365H Vs Shark IX141: Power and Performance Showdown
  7. Shark IX140 Vs IX141: Ultimate Shark Vacuum Face-Off
  8. Shark IX141 Vs IX141H: A Head-to-Head Showdown
  9. Shark IX141 Vs IZ363HT: Which Cordless Vacuum Is More Effective?

Related Articles to Shark Wz240

  1. Shark WZ140 Vs WZ240: Comparing Performance, Features, and Price
  2. Shark HV322 Vs WZ240: Comparing Two Powerful Shark Stick Vacuums

Reference:

5/5 - (1 vote)

Leave a Comment